Revolution and the "Third Rome"

I think it is very important that the conversation about Russian dream we began to yesenin the land, the land of the ryazan principality, which was in the history of independent, competing with Moscow, one of the most important spiritual and historical centers of the Russian people. The feudal war in the middle ages was everywhere — in Europe and in asia. I am absolutely not a supporter of the concept "Moscow — the third rome" since rome i perceive as absolutely hostile to the Russian people phenomenon. For me, rome is the earthly incarnation of the anti-christ dreams of the city-state, where the town-society, the government declared the highest divine value, and the pontifex maximus — the high priest, who is also the governor of the state, is almost the main servant of the god who devours human life. Why do we have to go in this obvious historical trap, in which we had the ruling elite are constantly striving themselves to become part of the West and russia, Russian people and other peoples living here, make a resource for purchasing assets in this global world the club of rome? rome will always perceive the land east of the danube, which came to the legions of trajan, the land of barbarians as a land of threat as the land that is intended to be a source of slaves and raw materials. Our military leaders, slavic, gothic, turkic — it was the people who became such as a rule for their quality for their bravery, for their ability to lead the troops, for their justice and mercy.

Because in our tradition slaves are hostages who just lost their weapons, had lived for some time together with those who took them prisoner, and then after some time they were either released on ransom, or sent home. Often, they were members of the families of their "Masters". Whenever Russia has rejected the illusion of the Western roman temptation, when she was doing support on herself, and was looking for her true essence, she has become a truly great world power. In this sense, the great tragedy of russia, i think the split of the xvii century, the main breakdown of Russian history and the Russian spirit. Romanovskaya know with the support of the clergy simply made a choice in favor of becoming a part of the Western elite and part of the global unite project.

Russian people resisted, he gave tens of thousands of martyrs, burned and tortured confessors of the orthodox faith, the revolt of razin, bulavin rebellion pugachev's rebellion. In the twentieth century, Russian people have created the soviet dream. She was not a marxist, she was exactly anti-Western, relying on the inclusion of tens of millions of people in the socio-historical processes of development. Children of farmers in this project were able to become poets, engineers, professors. My mother is a peasant's daughter, but she's 40-years, stalin was educated, was an engineer.

My grandfather was born in a Belarusian peasant family and graduated, knowing eight languages, his life a professor at two universities. Yes, if it were not for the revolution, who would it be? i recently said alexander andreyevich, that i, through our discussions with him, was deeply revised its outlook on stalin and the stalin era. I didn't understand and didn't feel it, but now, having crossed the milestone of 50 years, i understand that he was the leader who was looking for inner resources development, did not copy the Western circuit. I the rest of my life, of course, will devote the struggle for liberation from all forms of Western ideological and other occupation of my country and my people.