Psychotropic reports

with the help of tv broadcasts and the internet to demoralize the troops and the population, to deprive the enemy of purpose and will, to manipulate public opinion, to bring down the economy of the state. This is today's reality. Impact on the minds of people through television around the clock. It is necessary to take in hands the panel, as the layman that there is a constant flux, gradually changing the perception of the world. Forming the consciousness of the viewer information contains all the programs from desk to entertainment.

It has already been processed, spiced with special effects that the consumer was able to accept it, to learn and remember. "The helmet" without a mask in the chechen war live reports were that in grozny, Russian soldiers put up a human shield of local residents, and in samashki cut off people's heads and killing children. While the reality was different: that the militants were covered by old men, women and children, when out of the encirclement and captured soldiers exhibited in the window from which shot. During the war in Syria with false stories about "Barbaric bombing" of the Russian vks peaceful syrian residents of the famous cnn and the organization "White helmets", which are guided, apparently, by the teachings of nazi propaganda minister goebbels: the more monstrously the lie, the easier it is to believe. Cnn k. Baldwin almost made me cry in the air, talking about five year old syrian boy, omran was wounded at the bombardment of aleppo. And journalist christiane amanpour, interviewing sergey Lavrov, showed him the picture of the child with the words: "This is a crime against humanity. " it was later revealed that the house of a.

Danisha was destroyed by militants, and "Journalists" who starred omran, suggested the boy's parents money for participation in a propaganda campaign. "Our journalists have exposed one of the worst fakes on syria. Next time we'll take christiane amanpour and everyone. If only they have enough courage to talk to the boy omran and his family", – said the chief editor of rt margarita simonyan.

However, the footage has spread around the world in social networks, which gave rise to numerous public organizations and politicians to demand termination of the operation to liberate aleppo from the radicals, and the suffering of children to blame russia. April 4 this year, the Western tv channels showed the video staging "White helmets", about the consequences of air strikes with the use of toxic substances allegedly caused by the syrian bombers on the city of khan sheyhun in idlib province. This shows the type of ammunition did not belong to aviation means of defeat, and especially to the cq. It was missing tail feathers and some marking. Most likely, it was mine homemade.

As for the victims, the filmmakers attempted to simulate the effects of the use of sarin. However, the people in the frame there was no characteristic signs of poisoning with this s. But pupils in all the iris – footprints of the intake of narcotic or psychotropic drugs were evident. Victim assistance representatives of the "White helmets" provided without the use of personal protective equipment – gloves and masks.

But if it really was applied a toxic substance, the person in contact with him without protection, definitely would get defeated. In frames of the same chaotic and unprofessional moving healthy and vigorous "Rescue": some watered-affected water, ostensibly washing them with chemicals, the other immediately did cpr. In the video, the representative of the "White helmets" rough enough "Victim" of a child and for some reason, running with him to the wasteland. But just slowing down after his scenes were shot. All of this testimony is another fake, slyapat organization, a reputable creator of the staged "Documentary" and related terrorists. However, a cheap knockoff took effect.

The us president Trump, impressed by what he saw, he ordered to launch a missile attack on syrian airbase "Sirat" in the province of Homs, nine victims among civilians, including four children. In the "Manual on psychological warfare," released in the us, said: "We need to create the impression that all of the reported – is it true that a nail propaganda, its essence is composed of the direct harsh facts. The art of truth – not to tell a direct falsehood, but to elect what you want, and to mix the truth that the audience wants to hear. " in this spirit, american tv presenters again and again repeating the mantra about insurmountable technological gap between Russia and the us, continuing to buy our rocket engines rd-190. Unfortunately not yet possible to refute the entire stream of lies pouring from the tv screens, because of active opposition to the unbiased mass media by the oligarchs, politicians interfering in the work, closing and prohibiting the broadcast of unwanted channels, as is now happening in the United States with the Russian rt. The appointment of aggressors the reason for the defeat of the United States in Korea (1953-1956), vietnam (1965-1975), SoMalia (2005) and one other confrontation: the war was not supported by public opinion of americans. At the same time when the ideologues managed to convince the population of the country the necessity of hostilities, the Pentagon had victories (in the persian gulf in 1991, in Iraq in 2003). Then thanks to television coverage of the middle east in world public opinion purposefully raised the rejection of the actions of the "Aggressor," created an atmosphere that encourages decisive action punishing the invader.

In the analytical programs of the tv for a long time discussed how to curb it – economically, politically or militarily. And when public opinion, tired of the psychological tension came to the condition, the sighs of relief of the inhabitants was followed by air strikes. About the role of television in 1994, during the haitian crisis frankly told general shalikashvili d. : "We are not winning, yet cnn will not say that we win. " in modern warfare, unleashed by the Western countries, the calculation is done primarily on the defeat of the social consciousness of the enemy, the destabilization of the internal state of fallen under the hand of the people. So the us seized control of North Africa, Iraq, Afghanistan, yugoslavia, georgia, Ukraine. The dominance at the global and national outdoor television for the american countries is a key factor of influence. Leading broadcast only the point of view of the interests of the United States.

All their crimes against entire nations are presented as feats, and the responsibility for the mass murder of civilians rests with the enemy. To create an image of the enemy-court settlements, journalists and operators use various methods of influence on consciousness of people: staging a la hollywood non-existent events, false stories with invented characters and anti-heroes, the distortion of the meanings of the displayed actions, etc. The dominance of american television allows the ruling elite to manipulate public opinion and to administer global outrage: to carry out a coup, to overthrow political leaders, to provoke international conflicts, to unleash a civil war, to appoint and punish the perpetrators, to announce the winners. As shown by the american campaign against the Soviet Union, yugoslavia, Iraq, even a very strong opponent is unable to defend itself in the information war. You can't use tanks against tv or missiles against the internet. The war in their gates unleashed Washington's information war against Russia the important role played by Russian television. Agents of influence, who seized the television, diligently solve the problem of organic "Implantation" they need ideas in the mass consciousness.

In the role of "A good adviser and friend" tv tells the Russian, where to invest, where and how to be treated, which movie is better to see which politicians to trust, whom to be friends. And at the crucial moment for the country from the left, advise, and command, sometimes resorting to threats, who to vote for and who to blackball. Patriotic opposition considers television as a major criminal force to suppress the people, demoralizing the army and the country's leadership. And all this is served with sauce pluralism. Like, it is necessary to know different opinions.

Yes, the older generation knows the price of democracy and its minions. At the time, the society succumbed to liebigschule about our country: "A totalitarian state", the "Evil empire", "Prison of nations". But young people about the meanness of the democrats provocateurs do not know. She designed and rants of the modern domestic russophobes, hammered into the minds of the Russians via television. A special role is played by the so-called analytical programs, which spelled out the performers from near and far abroad decry our country and the people, like kovtun, triukhan, karasev, yakhno, zhovnirenko, bohm, corabi, maracucha.

In a decent society such boors are not allowed on the threshold, and the Russian leading, on the contrary, repeatedly invite them on their shows. And all this orgy of russophobia, the central channel is financed from the budget of the country. And by "Special guests" are paid for travel and accommodation. In any other country for such slander definitely would have brought a criminal case and denied entry. But not us.

Vladilen arsenyev, who led the tv programs ntv and ntv-plus, described the activities telekura: "We are engaged in a cynical matter. The less money, the less you think about the motherland. This old rule". Director of the public television of Russia anatoly lysenko gave good advice: "Highly intelligent people do not need to watch tv".

And academician vItaly ginsburg before his death said that sooner or later our Russian.