Community wrong way

The theme of islam in Europe has become central in the political discourse during the elections of the president of France. The same thing we saw in the united kingdom, holland, austria and even switzerland, where muslim communities by referendum, banned the building of minarets (although before the plebiscite, and they were only four pieces). Tensions between muslims and non-muslim world is clearly growing. And not only because of the prevailing racist or anti-immigrant sentiment, but often because of the horrific, the repulsive behavior of some refugees (assault, rape, hooliganism), and the antics of the muslim communities of Europe (promotion of terrorism and attempts to impose shariah). Before the situation improves (if it ever happens), she will most likely deteriorate and hard. What are the options?agree with the wise words of otto von bismarck that "Politics is the art of the possible".

Europeans, thinking that they simply expel all muslims or will be able to remove islam from Europe, are greatly mistaken. Similarly wrong and those (very few) muslims who want to establish a caliphate there. Everyone who offers a simple solution to the crisis, would do well if turned to the hegelian dialectic. And then realized that the outcome will not be a return to the previous state or the creation of the brand new reality. I argue that neither the muslim immigrants nor islam itself will never leave Europe – like it or not.

Why? yes, because if some illegal immigrants can be deported from any country, other muslims with European citizenship, or countrymen, converts to islam, to expel it's just not right. It's impossible from a legal point of view and from the point of view of practical. Deport to where? how? i worked as an interpreter in detention centres for refugees in switzerland and served as an analyst in the swiss general staff, where the problem of refugees often come to the fore. And i can responsibly say: any expert, really knows how the system works, is aware that the vast majority of immigrants will remain with us. Will remain even those who are economic migrants and not political refugees, and there are approximately 99 percent.

In the best case, the eu could, in theory and with a huge effort to close its borders to future immigrants. However, mass deportation is simply not an option. Hereinafter, the muslims already in Europe, will inevitably rise on the social ladder, even if now they are at the bottom. Many of them young, have overcome such difficulties through which most Europeans would never go. Their family, tribal, ethnic and religious ties are much stronger than those that can now be seen in the modern family most Europeans. And last but not least – their social energy is much stronger than that observed in the circles of the European establishment. So, even if the current generation of poorly educated and not integrated into European society, already educated, and integrated.

I've seen it on the numerous examples of economic migrants such as italians and Albanians. So when you see an Iraqi woman sweeping the floors of a local hospital, keep in mind that in a few years, here's her daughter – but the doctor. In other words, social power of the muslim community will inevitably increase. Does this mean that the eu will become a territory where women were forced to wear the veil, men will turn to islam or be killed to spread the slave markets, will rule sharia law and homosexuals will be to death to be stoned?of course not! this is a silly caricature of islam created and promoted by the anglo-zionist percentage of the population that is ruled by the empire and seeks to artificially create a clash of civilizations, to stay in power and continue to rule from behind the scenes. The muslims in the predictable future remains in Europe is fairly limited minority. But more importantly, "Hollywood-gilewski islam", which i described, not the world in which we want to live the majority of muslims.

In fact, many of them fled from their own countries in order not to live in following the caliphate. Can you talk about the crazies-the wahhabis, who already killed a lot of Europeans shouting "Allahu akbar"? aren't they the real ISIS? this is a complex issue. For example, it is worth noting that the vast majority of these madmen had strong ties with the secret services of European countries. Some of them even went to Israel. Doesn't it seem strange that their attacks are somehow always, as according to the schedule coincide with important political events in Europe?were there any real attacks by ISIS in Europe? was.

But i am quite sure that most of the attacks were operations of "False flag" type "Gladio", which was carried out by intelligence agencies of the eu and us ("The contract killing of america"). Readily agree that now in Europe there is a real and dangerous members of the "Al-qaeda"-ig. But unlike most refugees, these guys are breaking European laws and against them you can take legal action. In theory, Europe can even restore the death penalty for terrorism, or his apologetics. I understand that soon this will not happen, but of critical importance is the fact that it will depend on the political will of the Europeans.

In contrast to the mass expulsions, to realize that it is impossible – regardless of the political decisions or will. Can Europe be uprising or civil war? yes, but only if the government in power will be interested in the fact that it happened or was organized. However, as long as the state authorities have given security forces and the military the green light to invade and quell the rebellion, for the types of "Al-qaeda" lights up "Game over". So, while islam itself or muslims in general can't be expelled from Europe, European states are able to manage security – in the case that it is political will. Now the European politicians are split into two equally misguided camps: those who consider that any criticism of muslims is islamophobia, and those who know that all muslims and islam is bad, bad, harmful. This is a very primitive position. And more importantly, the result of both beliefs is the inability to achieve results. At the moment, many Europeans and americans seem to be bogged down in a false choice.

But, regardless of how much time this takes, reality will overtake them and they realize that there is no such thing as "One" islam or "One type" of muslim. Islam – the battle of ideapad that the islamic world is extremely diverse and that all the components necessary for the complete destruction of takfirist (whether al qaeda, ISIS, "Al-nusra" or any other is prohibited in the rf group) can only be found within islam itself. To illustrate this, just compare Russia and the eu. Unlike the eu, the Russian Federation is a single centralized state power, and quite strong. Russian intelligence and security agencies – among the best on the planet, as well as the armed forces of the Russian Federation. In russia, do not suffer from political correctness: here condemn islamic terrorism in the strongest terms. President Putin even made the famous declaration about his willingness to "Kill terrorists in the outhouse" if necessary. And the Russian did just that: they killed each and every chechen wahhabi leader.

Moreover, they have proudly announced it. The key difference from the eu that president Putin and the Russian people had the political will to stop the insurgency in chechnya, even if it needed to turn it into a pile of smoking ruins. But at the same time Vladimir Putin has made significant efforts to support muslim community in the country. He not only built a huge (and beautiful) mosque in Moscow, but has embarked on a major program to support the growth of traditional islam in Russia (as well as in the attitude of the orthodox church). With regard to chechnya, he was made head of the chr ramzan kadyrov's "Political son" and gave the chechens an extremely broad autonomy, especially in matters of religion. So: Putin – pomyslnosci or anti-muslim leader? neither one nor the other. The president understands a simple thing, entirely hidden from Western politicians, Russian is very good at killing takfirist, but only muslims can kill takfiri. Islam was never a threat – it lies in the takfiri.

Here's how wikipedia defines the concept of "Takfir": "In islamic law "Takfir" refers to the practice of excommunication, one muslim declares another muslim an infidel (kafir)". Read again carefully: the practice of declaring "Another muslim" infidels. Another muslim. Thus, the key characteristics takhirov is that everyone who doesn't follow their version of islam, they consider not even muslims and "Infidels. " in this case, it should treat these "Other muslims" to takfirism?actually there is nothing wrong in the theological sense of the concept of "Takfir". Just as there is nothing wrong in the concept of "Excommunication" or, for that matter, in terms of "Anathema" or "Heretic".

These categories, when used properly, essential in theological disputes. However, as the concept of "Excommunication", "Anathema" or "Heretic" someone can use as insults, slander or call to murder, takfiri – is primarily a way of thinking. Rifles and bullets cannot prevail over the way of thinking. Only ideas can defeat other ideas. And the Russians know it. In youtube there are several videos (alas, only in Russian), where the chechen leader ramzan kadyrov comes on the scene with the extremists and join with them in theological disputation.

Instead of simply ordering to kill everyone, he challenges them with a question: "So you think you musulma.