Navy Russian and "Ukrainian" audacity

For russia, the month of may special. There is even a private expression may holidays, when the whole country celebrates may day and victory day. However, this is not the only celebration that falls on the last month of spring. For example, three of the fleet of the Russian navy in the coming days, will celebrate their annual holidays:13 may – the day of the black sea fleet,may 18 - the day of the baltic fleet,may 21 – day of the pacific fleet date was not chosen randomly.

So, the beginning of the history of the black sea fleet was the entrance to akhtiarsky bay* located in the SouthWestern part of the crimean peninsula of the black sea, 11 ships of the azov flotilla under the command of the participant chesmensky battle vice-admiral f. A. Klokachev. This event occurred on 13 may 1783. Eighty years earlier, on may 18, 1703, a small flotilla under the command of peter i won the first battle victory over the swedes in the neva estuary.

This day is considered the birthday of the Russian baltic fleet. Thus, Russia is the founder and the sole owner of its military fleets in the black and baltic seas. However, 100 years ago in the time of the collapse of the Russian empire were the self-styled pretenders to the Russian maritime heritage. They were just "Hatched" from historical oblivion, forsaken by his Russian name, political "Ukrainians". Seeing in the revolutionary chaos, the chance to "Samostiynist", the separatists rushed headlong hastily cobble together their own state. Apparently the first "Independence supporters" was part of this state without an army does not happen, but if it will have its own fleet, it will be the biggest application for reasonable "Separateness". May 5 to may 8 (church calendar) 1917 was held in kyiv organized by the central council of the so-called first all-ukrainian military congress. Participants in the "High assembly" made for a national-territorial autonomy of Ukraine as part of russia, but supported the creation of "Independence" of the ukrainian army.

Separately addressed the issue of the "Ukrainian navy". It looked like this:clipping from the may issue of 1917 the newspaper "Visti ukraïnskoï centralno for""In relation to the navy, the congress considers it desirable and necessary: a) in the baltic fleet to equip some ships exclusively with teams of ukrainian nationality; b) as for the black sea [fleet], in view of the fact that it now consists of the majority of ukrainians, congress recognizes the need to fund it exclusively with ukrainians. "The audacity unheard of! not having a soul is no "Ukrainian" vessel "Independence supporters" unceremoniously allowed himself to dispose of the property. In addition, following the logic of "Ukrainian" seperatist, starting in the spring and summer of 1917, the baltic sea had to explore the ships with teams only from uzbeks, yakuts, jews, georgians and others, actually existed (in contrast to "Ukrainians") are a historical ethnic groups living in the Russian empire. Another great audacity was the announcement of refusal set in command of the black sea fleet of the Russian. In other words, the latter-day formation of the upr set out in one or two "Recruiting season" to usurp the entire black sea fleet, and thus the naval base of sevastopol by default. With the formation in 1922 of the ussr, the initiator of which became soviet Ukraine, the question of a separate "Ukrainian" fleet was withdrawn for many years until 1991.

And if after the collapse of the Soviet Union svidomye did not dare again to lay eyes on the baltic fleet, black sea fleet, the arrogance they have shown is unprecedented. It is well known that the successor of the ussr became the Russian Federation. "In a statement, the eu stressed that in respect of russia, a special recognition is not needed because it is naturally inherited rights of the former ussr in the international arena. " - wrote in those days "News". Except for the part of the assets inherited after the division of the federal property of the Russian Federation has assumed all debts of the former union. This gave her the right to some preferences in the first place in the armed forces of operational-strategic significance, requiring relationship and the preservation of a unified management structure, however, for example, are nuclear powers. On the eve of the collapse of the ussr the black sea fleet and had the status of operational-strategic enterprises. Ukraine could not to claim him.

But as you know, arrogance is the second happiness. Guided by this principle, april 5, 1992, ukrainian president leonid kravchuk signed a decree "On the transition of the black sea fleet in administrative subordination to the ministry of defense of Ukraine". In Moscow, apparently, did not expect such a dirty trick on the part of the "Brothers", but because the same decree "On the transition under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation black sea fleet" was signed by boris yeltsin, then president of the Russian Federation, with a delay of two days - april 7, 1992. The division of the black sea fleet became inevitable, because the "War of decrees" almost came then to real military conflicts. The negotiations were long and difficult. In the end the result was the signing in late may 1997, the interstate agreement on status and conditions of stay of the Russian black sea fleet on the territory of Ukraine.

One of his points was determined by the end date of the finding of the black sea fleet of Russia in sevastopol and other places of its basing and repair (feodosiya, nikolaev) - may 28, 2017. In april 2010, on the basis of the kharkiv agreements, the lease term of the points of basing of the black sea fleet in crimea was extended for 25 years after 2017 (with a possibility of extension for another 5 years — until 2042-2047 gt. ). There is no doubt that after the coup in february 2014 in Kiev the agreement would be annulled by the junta. "Ukrainian" the audacity in this case would be based on russophobia at the state level. "The presence of Russian troops in the crimea is actually a symbolic last outpost, fed the idea of reviving the great Russian empire to the West. Therefore, the destruction of a military base in Ukraine will mark the collapse of the imperial dreams of Putin, Medvedev and their henchmen", wrote "Ukrainian truth" back in may 2008 during the presidency of well-known russophobe viktor yushchenko.

Postmaydannoy Ukraine's leadership is already significantly more russophobic than yushchenko, with all his retinue. We must pay tribute to russia. She learned well the lesson that she was teaching at the time, kravchuk, and this time played the lead. 2 apr 2014 the ministry of foreign affairs of the Russian Federation informed the embassy of Ukraine in Russia on the entry into force of the federal law "On termination of the agreements concerning stay of the black sea fleet of the Russian Federation on the territory of Ukraine". Sevastopol and feodosiya have gone from Ukraine forever, and everything that is floating on the black sea under the yellow-blakytny flag, called the navy not dare many. Now the "Ukrainian" impudence against the black sea fleet of the Russian Federation was pathetic and comical.

For example, the ukrainian website "Fleet-2017" still counts down the number of days remaining until the end of the black sea fleet of Russia in sevastopol, another proof that perform the kharkiv agreements nobody in the Ukraine was not going to. Before the expiration of the term of the contract less than three weeks.