Missiles shot down, but targets destroyed. The correct view of things

what is the time of grace has come! time public knowledge! a time when, somehow suddenly, quietly, suddenly and inevitably, you can become an expert in military affairs and a connoisseur of all the secrets and about all these yesterday unknown missiles. And, most importantly, to get their predictions in a common rhythm. Or, alternatively, to the rhythm of a specific publication. Struck by the seriousness with which the serious experts are discussing in the press and on television, the number of missiles that have flown or not flown to the sites in syria. Serious people, referring to the ministries of defence, press secretaries, representatives of the ministry of foreign affairs and other officials of Russia and the USA argue about who was more.

Potential. This is not even at the level of the kitchen, benches in the park or any social networking. This is already happening at the country level. View to/in Ukraine. A pleasure to read comments on news of the bombing.

If i could not imagine the actual results of a missile strike, you would believe in the force of american arms. And visit our social networks. Quite the opposite reaction. Hooray, even soviet junk can easily down the vaunted "Tomahawk". And given the fact that Syria is a really big part of missile systems and air defense — the old soviet weapons, our urakali at least one point right.

Modern Russian weapons really better than the soviet one. Now a simple matter. What criteria are evaluated the results of a military strike? regardless of what the attack does. Is the number of bombs, rockets, shells or mines? is the number of rocket launches? maybe the number of sorties? the criterion for assessing this impact is simple. Performed the task or not. Let's look at syria.

Who and what goals were set to their units. The United States. Under the brand name of combating chemical weapons to destroy military factories and arms depots of Assad. However, to inflict serious damage on military airfields and thereby deprive the syrian army of air support. To negotiate with the opposition about the beginning of the offensive on damascus in the period of chaos after the impact.

Russian show the strength of the Western coalition. And the possibility of american weapons. Syria. Possible to "Soften" the blow of the americans and all those who support them. If you're lucky, destroy missiles and aircraft over the territory of syria.

To save your own military aircraft and personnel. Prepare for terrorist attack and, if possible, to continue the offensive. Russia. To prevent the bombing of damascus. To protect their own military bases and military advisers to the syrian army.

Not to allow coalition forces to help terrorists. Of course, tasks listed above, it is not complete. Well, the essence is not changed. The United States really wants to show the world that the power of the Russian army — no more than a soap bubble. Syria wants to survive as a state and continue to win.

Russia is regaining the honor and respect countries. However, after the loud tantrums of the president Trump, after threats and waving his fists after a perfectly beastly statements against Putin understood that the strike could not be avoided. It is understood in Washington, Moscow and damascus. Almost the whole world tense. And then there's the difficult statement of the Russian chief of the general staff. No matter what anyone said, but, unlike political scientists, journalists, deputies, generals of this level simply because the air is not shaken.

And if the chief of the general staff voiced the option of retaliation, then the necessary instructions have been given, plans developed and the scenarios studied. In fact, the chief of the general staff announced that Russia is ready for war with USA and NATO. Not global, not the third world or last world, no. Willingness to local shag in the middle east. With a soft hint of a possible arrival from the waters of the black and caspian seas. Here's what happened.

The coalition struck! and a blow of such force that, had it made "Grown-up" syrian military installations would be demolished from the face of the earth, and the number of victims would be estimated in the thousands. More than a hundred rockets at half a million dollars each. Impressive "Expenditure" shock? 200 million down the drain. The results? several wounded syrian soldiers? the destruction of chemical laboratory? falling into an abandoned airfield? well? Trump national hero of the United States. The man said — man did.

Assad is a national hero of syria. "Reassured" presumptuous yankees. Putin, a national hero of russia. Proved who had the testicles digout, and who bumout.

In the end, all in chocolate. Excellent result. I even thought stupid in the head skips. I do not agreed whether the leaders? so it is important to know the actual number shot down by missiles? to those who need it, know it.

Who, how and how much for the Russian, american, syrian, and probably for the military is not involved in the strike of the countries known. We want from the us military's confirmation of the downed missiles? we want american generals recognized the weakness of its own army? they that straps to press start? or Trump has backed a presidential term. I imagine that will start in the United States, while the destruction of 70% of the rockets confirmed? so that everything is in order, from the United States. We want our military has acknowledged that the entire system of missile and air defense systems that we create for several years, was zilch? our generals, too, with shoulder straps more comfortable. And the guys from "Rosoboronexport" for the throat take seriously. Weapons have to sell.

Currency for the state to make money and jobs in defense plants to provide. We want president Assad said that the Russian can not ensure the safety of syrian cities? he sprinkled ashes on his head, and repented to the West? we want the syrians abandoned their own victory? Assad has many times proved that bend is not able, that would be complete folly to expect that he will suddenly change. Therefore, you should not believe in everything i say and write. "In our times, eismann, to not trust anyone. Even myself. " believe in the result. The result you know.

So it will be able to make conclusions on other matters. Any version that will fit in the result will be true. Hit by rockets? yes. After all, they did not reach the goal. Not shot down missiles? yes.

After all, a full guarantee of the destruction of the object of the americans sent to that object five times more missiles than was necessary. The main thing — the result. By the way, you know what is the main result of this raid for russia? the most that neither is positive. More than three dozen new proposals for negotiations for the supply of air and missile defense systems. So we shot most of the day. Sorry, rocket, or shot down?.